Authors:
Matheus Mazzilli Pereira (UFRGS)
Marcelo Kunrath Silva (UFRGS )
Abstract: Social movements are not monolithic entities. Activists and organizations disagree about the goals of the movement and the tactics to achieve these goals, including their framing tactics. Cultural sociologists have questioned the idea that tactical choice is rationally and strategically oriented, arguing that tactics are morally and emotionally grounded in the activists' lives. We follow this insight, though suggesting that activists make constant efforts to experience their action as rational, claiming a strategic status and a sense of efficacy for their lines of action. By studying framing resonance disputes in interactions between animal rights activists and mass media in south Brazil, we found that, to make their tactics accountable and justifiable, activists mobilize different folk theories on social transformation which allow their actions to be experienced as the best means to achieve the movement's ends.
Fonte: Strategies and Outcomes
Link: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/s0163-786x20240000048005/full/html
